Proof of payment:
Decoding Desire- Unveiling the Tactics of Sexual Domination Escalation. This article delves into the complex and concerning world of Sexual Domination Escalation, a concept central to certain online communities and courses. It examines the core themes, techniques, and ideologies that form the framework of such approaches, particularly those popularized by figures like Stirling Cooper. We will scrutinize the way these programs promise to transform men and how they frame power dynamics in sexual interactions and the implications of their teachings.
An In-Depth Analysis of Sexual Domination Escalation by Stirling Cooper
This examination will peel back the layers of one controversial approach to male sexuality, scrutinizing its techniques and evaluating its impact on individuals within a broader societal context. We’ll explore the core mechanisms of Sexual Domination Escalation, including the psychological drivers involved, ethical considerations, and its often unsettling implications.
Introduction to Sexual Domination Escalation
Before diving into specifics, it’s crucial to understand what this approach entails. Sexual Domination Escalation doesn’t represent a mainstream understanding of healthy sexual dynamics. Instead, it encompasses a series of increasingly assertive and controlling actions aimed at achieving dominance within sexual encounters, often with the goal of female submission. This is not the BDSM of mutual respect, consent, and exploration; rather, it often leans heavily on an imbalance of power cloaked in a narrative of empowerment. These methodologies are presented as quick fixes for perceived male sexual inadequacy, often playing on insecurities and anxieties about masculinity. It suggests that by progressing through specific control techniques, a man can attain mastery over female sexuality, ultimately leading to enhanced sexual success. At its heart, Sexual Domination Escalation frames sexuality as a battle where one party seeks to conquer, rather than a reciprocal landscape of mutual desire and exploration.
Overview of the Course
Stirling Cooper’s particular offering appears to encapsulate this ideology. It is presented as a structured, step-by-step journey toward sexual prowess. The curriculum is divided into seven modules, taking participants from beginner to advanced techniques, with the final goal of mastery via what is presented as S&M practice. It is not purely instructional; it also provides an emotional and psychological framework by which to approach these tactics. The course markets itself as a solution to male sexual inadequacy, claiming to teach specific techniques for female arousal and orgasm, almost as if sexuality were a mechanic’s manual. It is structured in a way where each module builds upon the last, promising an almost linear progression toward domination abilities. The course is not just educational; it presents itself as a path towards self-transformation. It argues that once a man masters this approach, he will become more dominant and, therefore, more sexually successful. The course also includes Stirling Cooper’s own career in pornography is used as “proof” of his qualifications. This is a particularly dangerous rhetoric as porn, by nature and intent, is not a real-world representation of human sexuality.
Purpose and Objectives
The stated objective of the program is for men to overcome sexual inadequacy by learning to dominate women, which it portrays as a skill that can be acquired through training, as if human interaction, and particularly sexual intimacy, were a video game to be mastered. It seeks to transform its participants into what the course defines as an “alpha male,” achieving this transformation by teaching specific methods of control, manipulation, and ultimately, domination. In other words, it’s aim is to deconstruct the current societal view of masculinity and replace it with a new one that centers on the dominance through a rigid framework of techniques. Ultimately, the aim appears to be to equip participants with techniques they can use not only in the bedroom but also in their daily lives, all under the guise of self-improvement. The course is designed to take insecure men and make them believe they hold the keys to sexual fulfillment by placing women in submissive positions. This highlights a critical flaw: It objectifies women as beings there to be conquered rather than respected and enjoyed harmoniously. This underlying purpose is built upon the premise that many men suffer from a lack of sexual prowess and this course is their solution.
Key Themes in Sexual Domination Escalation
Here we’ll expose some of the core beliefs and concepts that underpin the idea of Sexual Domination Escalation, exploring the way these themes reinforce and validate tactics that are often problematic and harmful.
The Concept of the “Alpha” Male
The concept of the “alpha” male is central to the ideology of Sexual Domination Escalation, presenting an outdated tribal model of masculinity as the pinnacle of human achievement. It positions men in a hierarchical structure where only a select few possess the innate ability to lead, thrive, and attract sexual partners. This model reduces the complexity of human interactions to an oversimplified battle of dominance and power. In this context, being an “alpha” is not just about being confident; it’s about exerting control over all other men and especially over women. The course, in this aspect, encourages men to subscribe to this hierarchical vision of society and to adopt behaviors it associates with such as aggression, assertiveness, and dominance, often at the expense of empathy and compassion. The “alpha” male is presented as the ideal, and the idea of becoming an alpha through specific techniques is what drives men to the course. It’s a concept ripe with problematic implications, reducing human potential to such a narrow and damaging definition.
Sexual Domination as an Acquired Skill
One of the core tenets of Sexual Domination Escalation is that sexual prowess is not an innate characteristic but rather a skill anyone can learn through deliberate practice, a concept that detaches the very human experience from natural interaction and turns it into a mechanical process. The course suggests that with the right steps and techniques, a man can learn to manipulate women’s responses and dictate sexual outcomes. This is a radical deviation from understanding sexuality as a realm of personal experience, emotional connection, and mutual expression. It presents all women as similar, with identical ‘buttons’ to push. This view suggests that with enough training, a man can learn to dominate the dynamic of any sexual encounter, reducing an intimate act to a mechanical exercise. This idea is particularly harmful because it minimizes the complexity of sexual interaction and ignores the roles of mutual respect and genuine care, replacing it with an outdated conquest mentality that treats sexual partners as objects to be manipulated..
Female Submission: A Central Theme
At the core of Sexual Domination Escalation is the ideal of female submission, presented not as an outcome of mutual desire or a role chosen within a relationship that is based on mutual understanding but as the goal of a man’s aggressive pursuit of dominance. This theme is problematic on multiple levels because it completely disregards female agency, reducing woman to passive recipients of male desires. This ideal is directly tied to the “alpha male” concept, where the measure of a man’s prowess is gauged by his ability to exert control and elicit submission from the woman he is with. The course materials often reinforce this, treating female submission not as a potential aspect of a healthy relationship but as a reflection of a man’s personal achievement and skill in manipulation. This narrow and demeaning perspective on female sexuality ignores the wide spectrum of female preferences and desires, portraying it as a simple reaction to male dominance. It treats women as tools created solely for the fulfilment of male fantasies.
Understanding the Target Audience
Let’s analyze who these types of programs are aimed at, acknowledging the vulnerabilities these courses often exploit and the emotional drivers that lure people toward this specific brand of self-improvement and its potentially harmful consequences.
Demographics of Potential Participants
The potential consumer for a course on Sexual Domination Escalation is typically a man who feels insecure about his sexual capabilities and may perceive himself as lacking in the traits he believes are associated with masculinity. He may be a man who has experienced romantic or sexual rejections, attributing such experiences to his own perceived inadequacies, rather than a result of mismatched relationships. These men are often young adults who feel lost and frustrated with their dating and are searching for a clear-cut manual for success in romantic relationships. They might be drawn to the promises of the course, seeing it as an answer to their lack of sexual success and confidence. These men may have difficulties understanding the dynamics of a healthy relationship including communication, emotional support, and mutual understanding. This is an audience often seeking easy solutions in complex areas of life and is willing to subscribe to the idea that mastery of certain techniques can solve deeply personal and often complex issues. This vulnerability makes them prime targets for courses promising quick routes to self-improvement.
Emotional Triggers and Insecurities Addressed
The marketing strategies employed by courses like these are built upon exploiting the emotional vulnerabilities of men, particularly their insecurities about their masculinity and sexual performance. They use charged language that resonates with feelings of inadequacy, positioning the course as the solution to these perceived shortcomings. The course often preys on those feelings of not being good enough, offering a clear path to what it defines as success. The narrative is persuasive in that it is often communicated with the help of emotionally charged terms, which helps create an “us vs them” dynamic. Testimonials from individuals who claim to have achieved success through these techniques are used to build an element of trust. Ultimately these courses aim to provide what feels like a quick solution to deeply complex emotions and inadequacies, and therefore, they attract men in vulnerable places. There is the promise of rapid, tangible, results for a complex issue, and this is what the course trades in. It offers confidence by promising control over complex interactions.
The Jaded Woman Narrative
This narrative strategy is an important piece of the puzzle within these frameworks of dominance, and it is worth studying how this often problematic viewpoint is used to legitimize certain ways of thinking about women.
Impact of Modern Dating Culture
The course often builds its narrative around a perceived crisis in modern dating, attributing the challenges men face to a radical change in the way that women act, especially in regards to dating and relationships, rather than the very real issues of how complex human interactions truly are. It suggests that modern dating culture has empowered women to be fickle and demanding, always on the lookout for something “better” and therefore have no true emotional value in partnerships. This narrative demonizes modern women, portraying them as inherently promiscuous that cause frustration for men. The course suggests that women are hyper-selective in their choices and have endless options, leading to unstable and unsatisfying romantic engagements for men. This perspective plays into male frustration and often anger with dating, positioning Sexual Domination Escalation as a method by which men can reclaim the power they feel has been stolen from them. It encourages men to adopt tactics that aim to overcome these perceived changes in women’s sexual options, positioning the course as the solution. The goal is to present an enemy to the men it is trying to recruit, and women and modern dating are those enemies.
The Role of Sexual Options in Women’s Choices
The narrative used is one that focuses on the idea that because women have more sexual options, this means they now reject men without reason or accountability. The course positions itself as a way to “win her over” and “make her desire” the man in question. It essentially suggests that modern dating has been unfairly stacked against men, and the answer is to manipulate a specific course of action. It frames women’s sexual choices in ways that are reductive, oversimplified and lacking in nuance. This ignores the natural complexity of human connections, and instead insists upon presenting scenarios in which men and women are antagonists. At the root of it all is the idea that women who have a choice are unstable, and must be forced to have emotional connection with men they would otherwise reject.
The Un-beta-tizing Mission
Here, we will shed light on how these programs claim to mold men into something “better”, exploring the underlying philosophy of masculinity.
Societal Perceptions of Masculinity
**Sexual Domination Escalation courses are often underpinned by a critique of modern perceptions of masculinity, suggesting societal forces have created a generation of weak, docile men – “beta males,” in that terminology. They portray modern masculinity as being “softened” by empathy and a willingness to be emotional and less domineering, and encourages men to return to an idealized version that is supposedly more authentic and successful. This view criticizes men who do not fit into traditional masculine roles, portraying them as less desirable. This plays on men’s insecurities and feelings of inadequacy in a society that doesn’t always champion the traditional hypermasculine model, which courses like Stirling Cooper’s seek to capitalize on. The course subtly encourages participants to reject the societal shifts towards more inclusive and compassionate expressions of masculinity, often labeling them as damaging. It taps into a societal discourse that is already present in order to then claim to be the answer. The societal view of masculinity is complex and varied, but the course reduces it to a very simplistic point of view.
Re-masculinization and Its Implications
The idea of “re-masculinization” within these courses suggests that men must regain their supposedly lost dominance in society and relationships by re-adopting a traditional, hypermasculine persona. It positions this concept as the cure to all of their relationship problems. This process often involves adopting aggressive patterns of behaviour, emotional detachment, and a willingness to exert control in their interactions with women. The course proposes to provide simple, step-by-step means for men to be their “most masculine”, as they define it, selves, promising to boost their appeal, particularly with women. This focus on aggression and control often ignores genuine personal growth, empathy, and the kind of communication that leads to healthier relationships. By promoting this kind of re-masculinization, there is a rejection of healthier models of masculinity, including empathy, emotional awareness, and vulnerability.
Structure of the Course Content
Let’s dissect the very foundation of the program, in order to better understand the structure of learning progression and its potential impacts and limitations.
Overview of the 7 Modules
Stirling Cooper’s course is divided into seven modules, the purpose of which is to progressively train participants in Sexual Domination Escalation. These are structured and presented in an accessible manner, so men can easily pick them up and use them. Each module is designed to build upon the previous one. The modules purportedly cover everything from basic manipulation tactics to advanced S&M procedures. This structure is designed to move men toward mastery as quickly as possible, not accounting for the need for ethical considerations. The structure of the course is designed to make it appear that there is an easy, clear, path to sexual success. This structured approach of the course often resonates with individuals who want clear, easy to grasp solutions in complex areas. It presents dominance as a step by step skill to master, not an element of a dynamic built on mutual desire.
Progression from Beginner to Advanced Techniques
The program utilizes a carefully designed progression from introductory concepts to more complex tactics, moving participants through increasingly assertive and dominant methods. The early modules might cover basic persuasion and confidence tactics, while the later ones focus on control through S&M based procedures. This progression is designed to desensitise men to the idea of domination gradually, which makes this approach that much more dangerous. The staged progression presents an illusion of natural development and makes it easier for its users to adjust to increasingly extreme practices. This systematic increase in aggression and control is done in a way that often feels organic, which is a very dangerous manipulation because it takes men from being slightly controlling to far more than that.
Techniques Taught in the Course
Here, we will delve into the specific methods, tools and strategies presented as ways to achieve the goals described above.
Analyzing Specific Techniques for Sexual Domination
The course uses specific tactics that are framed as practical methods for achieving Sexual Domination Escalation. These may include using persuasive language, controlling physical presence, or using specific physical acts that are designed to elicit submission from a woman. These tactics are often positioned as a matter of knowledge and technique, detaching them from the realm of ethics and human empathy. There is little to no discussion of the emotional needs or agency of the woman involved. These techniques often rely on misinterpreting female behaviours and desires, creating a dynamic that is built on miscommunication and misunderstanding, and often a complete lack of mutual respect. The methods and ideas are positioned in a way that makes them sound like a solution to all problems and that anyone could benefit from knowing about them, rather than being methods of control and manipulation.
Role of Consent in Dominant Practices
The course often minimizes the importance of consent, positioning it within the context of a negotiated power dynamic. It portrays consent as something that can be manipulated, or persuaded, rather than being a fundamental element of ethical sexual engagement, often playing on an area of sensitivity for many people. In these contexts, consent is often presented as a hurdle to overcome rather than a boundary to respect, an approach that goes to the root of the issue. This is extremely dangerous because it completely ignores the fundamental ethics of sex and reinforces beliefs that domination can come at all costs. The absence of a nuanced conversation about consent, in favour of the idea of “winning” women, is a major ethical concern. It presents a worldview in which the needs and autonomy of one person are less important than the desires of another.
Marketing Strategies Employed
This will explore how manipulative tactics are used to attract the intended audience and make them subscribe to often complex ideologies with potentially harmful consequences.
Language and Imagery Used in Promotion
The marketing of this course heavily relies on emotionally charged language, promises of quick transformations and a clear sense of us vs them. It uses terms like ‘mastery,’ ‘dominance,’ and ‘alpha’ to appeal to male ego and insecurities, with the aim of creating a sense of urgency. The accompanying imagery is carefully selected, often showing men in positions of power and control. There are images of women who seem to be submissive and in awe of the man in question, playing into the core ideas of the course. The marketing material often uses language designed to amplify male frustration, positioning the course as a pathway to empowerment, which is a complete deception. It also aims to create a sense of urgency and exclusivity, as though joining the course itself will make men ‘better’.
Testimonials and Customer Feedback
The usage of testimonials and customer feedback to create a sense of trust is a common marketing tactic. The customer feedback presented is very carefully curated, to present positive stories of men experiencing transformations and success, without any external scrutiny. These testimonials are carefully designed to emphasize personal transformations and the course’s effectiveness. There are often promises of a money-back guarantee to create a sense of safety for the target audience by playing on their very specific and very reasonable fear of failure. This provides an illusion of trust when they are not authentic or vetted. The testimonial aspect is also very manipulative as it removes any sense of independent investigation and promotes a feeling of group acceptance.
Underlying Ideologies Explored
This dives into the bigger ideas that form the basis of these approaches, exploring how they shape perceptions and behaviours.
Hypermasculinity and Its Representation
The core ideology of Sexual Domination Escalation is built upon hypermasculinity, which is a very damaging and outdated view of manhood. It reinforces a limited and superficial concept of what it means to be a man. This concept goes beyond traditional masculinity, promoting an extreme and often-toxic form of gender expression. This is achieved through the promotion of physical dominance, emotional restraint, and an almost obsession with sexual conquest, as a way to be a man. This ideology completely disregards any softer masculine traits including empathy and vulnerability. It is a form of masculinity that promotes aggression and hostility toward women, effectively turning human relationships into a never ending battle.
Objectification of Women in Sexual Contexts
At the core of the ideology of this program is the objectification of women when it comes to sexual practices. It views women as entities that are there to fulfil male desires and have their sexual responses controlled through specific techniques, effectively ignoring their agency, feelings, and rights. The course promotes the idea that women’s responses to men can be manipulated for the sole purpose of a man’s pleasure, completely disregarding both consent and mutual understanding. The objectification of women is not just present in the specific techniques but also in the language and narrative of the program. This objectification leads to a complete disregard of a woman’s complex feelings and individual desires. The course treats women as tools or game pieces, rather than individuals within shared experiences.
Critique of Simplified Views on Female Sexuality
Here, we will challenge the simplified and damaging understanding of female sexuality presented by these courses, highlighting its limitations in the real world.
Exploring Female Sexual Agency
One of the main criticisms of Sexual Domination Escalation is that it entirely ignores female sexual agency. These courses assume a very limited range of female responses to sexual interaction, portraying women as simple beings that react predictably to certain methods and techniques. This viewpoint minimizes the complex ways in which women experience pleasure and desire. The course also ignores the need for emotional connection and genuine understanding in any type of sexual situation. This disregard for female sexuality is not only inaccurate but also very deeply damaging. It removes women from the conversation and positions them as passive objects to be controlled, and disregards the vast spectrum of preferences women have. The concept of female agency is missing entirely, positioning women as existing purely to serve male sexual gratification.
Challenges to the Course’s Premises
The entire premise of Sexual Domination Escalation is fundamentally flawed. It rests on the outdated belief that men must dominate to win female affection and desire, completely disregarding the fact that healthy relationships are built upon mutual respect, consent, and empathy. The claim that women’s desires can be reduced to simple reactions to a specific set of techniques is completely erroneous and dismisses the spectrum of preferences and experiences that make up female sexuality. The idea that emotional understanding can be replaced with techniques is a reductionist and dangerous one that damages any chance of healthy relationships. The premise of this type of course is not just misguided but is also harmful, as it promotes false expectations about sexual interactions. It misrepresents the essential aspects of healthy relationships and reinforces a highly reductive and dangerous viewpoint on sexuality.
Ethical Considerations Surrounding the Course
Here, we analyze the ethical issues raised by those tactics, exploring implications for human relations and its potential impacts.
Consent and Power Dynamics
The largest ethical concern that surrounds Sexual Domination Escalation is its approach to consent and how it often manipulates power dynamics. The course often reduces the idea of consent to a mere formality or a step to overcome, rather than a fundamental aspect of any healthy relationship. Often the idea of verbal consent is not something promoted for the people who subscribe to these methods, and consent is assumed or manipulated through different methods. The course often suggests that as long as the woman “agrees”, it does not matter how or why she does, creating an incredibly alarming concept that ignores the real meaning of consent and that undermines the very possibility of any truly healthy interaction. Ignoring genuine consent can cause serious harm and damage to the psychological health of all parties involved. The course promotes the idea that consent is a box to be ticked rather than an active, ongoing, and fully informed agreement from both sides, and positions these steps as methods to overcome that obstacle.
Influences of Red Pill Ideologies
The ideologies expressed in these courses often align with that of “red pill” philosophies. Red pill ideologies often reject traditional values and argue that women are inherently problematic, especially when it comes to relationships and mating. This is often done by positioning women as manipulative and unreliable. The course also advocates for an “us vs them” mentality, portraying women as an opposing force to be navigated through the use of dominance rather than as partners. This view is deeply problematic and dangerous. Ultimately, these courses often function as a vehicle for a wider, deeply problematic ideologies. Red pill approaches and its influence has detrimental effects on how both men and women view each other and what a healthy relationship should look like.
The Promise of Transformation
Let’s take an objective view of what such programmes claim to offer and look at the impacts compared to what it actually might deliver.
Expectations vs. Reality
The promises offered by Sexual Domination Escalation courses often fail to materialize in real-world practical scenarios. By positioning dominance as a sure way to sexual success, there is an emphasis on techniques that do not translate into genuine connection. The expected mastery of manipulation often leads to dissatisfaction, as it does not fulfil human’s deep need for true intimacy and understanding. Those who adopt the course’s tactics often feel disillusioned when they find that these methods fail to produce the desired and promised results. This course is not as simple as plugging in a few simple steps, as it promises to be, and men are often left behind, frustrated, and perhaps even more insecure than when they started. The very idea of having a “technique” to achieve sexual happiness is a major point of failure.
The Psychological Impact on Participants
The psychological impact of engaging with Sexual Domination Escalation courses can be severe. They can lead to the development of unhealthy relationships that promote manipulation, control, and a complete lack of empathy. Men often experience increased anxiety, frustration, and a growing sense of isolation in their personal connections. This often results in an inability to create and sustain fulfilling, healthy relationships with women. This often leads to loneliness and continued frustration. These tactics also cause men to lose their sense of self by focusing solely on achieving success, as defined by the course. The focus on superficial mastery comes at the expense of real personal growth and emotional insight. This ultimately hinders their ability to engage in truly mutually satisfying and healthy relationships with others.
Comparison with Other Sexual Education Resources
This part will analyze how those programs juxtapose with healthier and more balanced approaches to sexuality and intimacy.
Traditional Approaches to Sexuality
Traditional sex education often falls short in addressing the complexities of relationships, desire and how to have honest communication. This approach is in stark contrast to Sexual Domination Escalation, which promotes an approach of mastery in controlling another person’s desire. Traditional approaches tend to offer limited content about topics, such as consent, emotional connection, and building healthy relationships, all elements that are crucial for human interaction. Traditional, often very clinical, educational resources tend to focus on the mechanics rather than true emotional intelligence, and therefore, are also often not fully useful. While traditional education is often too clinical, this course is actively dangerous and misrepresenting human sexuality. Traditional learning fails when it does not promote conversation and honesty, and this course seeks to manipulate this and twist it into a need for dominance.
Alternative Perspectives on Domination and Submission
Alternative perspectives on domination and submission, usually found in the BDSM or kink community, focus on the mutual exchange of power, consensual acts and shared experiences of enjoyment. These alternative views emphasize the importance of trust and communication. It’s a very different landscape compared to Sexual Domination Escalation where the practice of submission is usually based on the need of control rather than on the mutual desire of those involved. The BDSM community often engages in active and involved conversations about limits and consent between partners. The course promotes a very toxic form of these practices that lack communication, empathy and care, and that often rely on manipulation and lack mutual boundaries. BDSM practices and its emphasis on clear boundaries and consent are important because it highlights the contrast with the harmful ideas of control presented by those concepts. These alternative perspectives show that power dynamics can be experienced in healthy, empowering, and mutually respectful ways.
Cultural Reflections in Sexual Domination Escalation
Here we will explore socio-cultural contexts in which these concepts exist and the way they continue to be present in society as a whole.
Societal Attitudes Toward Masculinity
The prevalence and popularity of courses on Sexual Domination Escalation reveal deeply embedded societal attitudes toward masculinity, in particular, one that praises dominance and control. It shows that there is a large group of men who feel that they do not meet the expectations of traditional gender expectations and these courses offer a quick fix to this problem. The widespread presence of this issue also indicates that cultural dialogues around healthy masculinity are not as far along as what is needed. The course exploits those frustrations by offering a version of masculinity that is easy to grasp and follow. This highlights that there are men who feel that they are inadequate and they are willing to subscribe to such a harmful perspective and it further shows a need for change of perceptions of masculinity. These societal attitudes continue to influence the way how men treat women and also how they view themselves.
Impact on Relationships and Interpersonal Dynamics
The concepts often presented by these courses have significantly negative impacts on relationships and interpersonal dynamics. The methods of control and manipulation used within this context often erode trust and honest communication, therefore creating very unhealthy situations. These techniques often create an unbalanced power dynamic in which one party is constantly in control and the other disempowered. Relationships in which these principles are put into place often lack genuine connection, and instead build mistrust, resentment and eventually, conflict. The approach undermines the ability for people to create happy, balanced and healthy relationships and replaces them very volatile ones. When this kind of relationship dynamics become normalized, it damages everyone involved and it is detrimental to healthy interpersonal relationships.
Conclusion
Ultimately, Sexual Domination Escalation isn’t about empowerment or achieving a fulfilling sexual life. It’s a manipulative framework built on exploiting male insecurities, reducing women to objects, and promoting a dangerous and outdated vision of masculinity. By understanding the core mechanisms, we can better recognize and counteract their influence. It’s crucial to advocate for balanced, ethical approaches to sexuality that prioritize respect, consent, and mutual well-being for all involved. This exploration serves as a strong warning about the dangers of oversimplified solutions to complex human emotions. Programs designed to manipulate individuals through emotional vulnerabilities and by promoting the idea of control have no place in our society. It is therefore, vital to support and champion ethical, respectful and healthy approaches to intimacy. This exploration is just a stepping stone in the larger conversation that needs to be had about the ways we understand and approach the topic of sexuality.
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.